MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407607892 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113241

Novel Endpoint Characterization Factors for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Terrestrial Acidification

2025· article· en· W4407607892 on OpenAlex
M. Lebrun, Martin Dorber, Francesca Verones, Andrew D. Henderson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Indicators · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceLife-cycle assessmentOcean acidificationEcologyEnvironmental resource managementClimate changeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• New terrestrial acidification characterization factors for vascular plants. • Combination of existing fate, updated soil response and effect factors, and GEP. • Aggregated impacts from NO x -/NH x -/SO x -emissions deposited anywhere in the world. • Harmonized methodology to allow cross-impact-category comparison of LCA results. Human activities involving combustion and agricultural practices, among others, lead to the release of acidifying compounds such as nitrogen oxides (NO x ), sulfur oxides (SO x ), and ammonia (NH 3 ). These substances are the main drivers of human-induced terrestrial acidification, a geochemical process resulting mainly in the decline of soil pH, causing ecosystem damage and biodiversity loss. A relevant tool to quantify impacts of human activities is Life Cycle Assessment where characterization factors are used to estimate the potential environmental impacts per unit of emission. These are derived from models of environmental processes occurring along the stressor’s impact pathway, connecting an emission to its potential environmental damage. Here, new ecosystem quality characterization factors for terrestrial acidification were developed, assessing the potential global loss of vascular plant species. The final values combine four elements: existing fate factors, updated soil response factors, recently revised effect factors, and the Global Extinction Probability. The latter allows to convert the local decline in species richness into a global species loss. The regionalized marginal characterization factors provided represent the aggregated global biodiversity impact in all the world’s ecoregions due to an acidifying emission (of NO x , NH x , or SO x ) from a specific country. The values cover five orders of magnitude (from 10 −16 to 10 −11 PDF global .yr.kg emitted −1 ), and the comparison to currently implemented values has helped both validate the calculation pathway and confirm the need for updated factors. Following current harmonization recommendations, terrestrial acidification impacts can now be compared to those from other stressors estimated in global Potential Disappeared Fraction of species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it