MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407624191 · doi:10.2523/iptc-25079-ea

Unplanned Casing Shoe Setting Led to a New Well Schematic Optimized Design for Futures Wells at Quesqui Field

2025· article· en· W4407624191 on OpenAlexaff
Alicia Rivera, Juan M. Peralta, Armando E. del Río Hernández, R. Maldonado

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingSchematicFutures contractField (mathematics)Computer scienceEngineeringPetroleum engineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper documents the successful optimization of well schematic after an unplanned casing setting. That failure required the use of an Ultra Low Invasion Reinforcement Technologies while drilling Q-49 well in Mexico, which changed the well schematic design for all future wells. The use of these technologies allowed for the effective expansion of the operating window, ultimately leading to a successful completion of the drilling stage without the need for additional casing. The study highlights best practices and lessons learned during the drilling process. The implementation of Wellbore Shielding technology (also known as Ultra Low Invasion) in the recent field development has proven to be an extremely resistant and flexible solution for real-time hole reinforcement while drilling. This technology has enabled continuous operations without compromising well integrity. Constant monitoring of concentration levels through SBT (Sand Bed Test) enables early detection of unfavorable conditions and prompt action, as demonstrated in the case study to be presented. The use of software while drilling also led to early detection and monitoring of the fluid conditions. This application allowed the operator to increase the operative window over 900 psi, without destabilizing the wellbore. The drilling fluid density used exceeded well above the maximum permissible level of the density gradient, however no destabilization was observed. This solution also resulted in the elimination of an additional casing to isolate the two formation pressures. Since two different formation pressures had to be drilled with the same drilling fluid, the use of this technology represented a dramatic reduction of fluid loss rate, from 95 bbl/h to less than 1.9 bbl/hr. This case study demonstrates how using an appropriate formation-strengthening technology, which is proven to significantly increase the operating window and significantly reduce lost circulation under dynamic conditions without suspending operations for loss control, optimizes operating costs and improves operating conditions, leading to the well's success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceSame topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207