Bibliographic record
Abstract
Известный сербский святитель, основатель Американо-Канадской сербской епархии, в дореволюционную эпоху жил в России и в 1916 г. закончил Петроградскую Духовную Академию. Его научным руководителем был профессор Академии Иван Саввич Пальмов, который сочувственно отнесся к его работе. Известно, что они пересекались и ранее, в рамках деятельности Славянского благотворительного общества. В статье история их контактов рассматривается в динамике и подвергается осмыслению. Использован еще неизвестный российским читателям важный исторический источник — мемуары святителя Мардария. Главные выводы статьи заключаются в том, написание иеромонахом Мардарием диссертации об А. С. Хомякове было в известной степени предопределено сходством взглядов будущего святителя и профессора Пальмова, которое проявилось во время их общения во внеакадемической активности обоих, что не помешало святителю Мардарию впоследствии занять кардинально иную идейную позицию, когда он оказался в США. The famous Serbian saint, founder of the American-Canadian Serbian Diocese, lived in Russia in the pre-revolutionary era and graduated from the Petrograd Theological Academy in 1916. Its reviewer was Academy Professor Ivan Savvich Palmov, who was sympathetic to his work. It is known that they intersected earlier, as part of the activities of the Slavic Charitable Society. In the article, the history of their contacts is considered in dynamics and subjected to comprehension. An important historical source, still unknown to Russian readers, is used — the memoirs of St. Mardary. The main conclusions of the article is that the writing of a dissertation on A. S. Khomyakov by Hieromonk Mardary was to a certain extent predetermined by the similarity of the views of the future by the saint and Professor Palmov, who manifested itself during their communication in the extra-academic activity of both, which did not prevent Saint Mardary from subsequently taking a radically different ideological position when he ended up in the USA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".