MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407638102 · doi:10.1186/s13036-025-00481-4

The stability and self-assembly of tri-calcium silicate and hydroxyapatite scaffolds in bone tissue engineering applications

2025· article· en· W4407638102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TabrizTabriz University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsCalcium silicateCalciumScaffoldMaterials scienceBiocompatibilityTissue engineeringBiomedical engineeringBone tissueChemical engineeringChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fabrication of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications often involves the utilization of two distinct categories of biomaterials, namely calcium phosphates and calcium silicates. The selection of these materials is based on their biocompatibility, bioactivity, and mechanical characteristics that closely resemble those of natural bone. The present research examined the utilization of hydroxyapatite (HAP) and tri-calcium silicate (TCS), which are among the most commonly utilized materials in calcium phosphates and calcium silicates, in the context of bone scaffolding applications. A molecular dynamics simulation was conducted to investigate the impact of different concentrations of ceramic nanoparticles, when combined with sodium alginate (SA) hydrogel, on the fabrication of bone scaffolds.The stability and self-assembly were assessed through several parameters, such as the solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), radius of gyration (Rg), radial distribution function (g(r)), root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF), hydrogen bonding, van der Waals, electrostatic, and total energies. The findings indicate that the addition of 10 wt% HAP and TCS to the SA hydrogel matrix results in a more compact, stable, and potentially less hydrated structure. Accordingly, the experimental validation of these simulation approved our in silico findings. Experimental rheology and mechanical properties evaluation validate our simulation results, indicating a superior characteristic of TCS10 and HAP10 inks and 3D-printed scaffolds among other composition ratios. This could potentially benefit the in vitro and in vivo performance of the scaffold and its interaction with cells. The aforementioned traits are considered fundamental for the successful execution of the scaffold in the field of BTE. The findings indicate that TCS samples exhibit superior properties when compared to HAP samples, specifically in terms of composition with SA hydrogel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it