Pooled screening identifies combinatorial CAR signaling domains for next-generation CAR-M immunotherapies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered macrophages (CAR-Ms) hold great promise for solid tumor immunotherapy. The intracellular domains (ICDs) of CARs determine the phenotypic output of therapeutic macrophages but remain largely unexplored. Here, we constructed a CAR library containing 131 unique signaling domains derived from native immune receptors and identified 17 ICDs that enhance macrophage phagocytosis, inflammatory responses, or tumor infiltration in vitro and in vivo . We further developed a scalable 3’ barcode technology, CARode, to uniquely label and trace ICD variants within large-scale combinatorial CAR library and applied it to single-cell RNA sequencing and single-cell CAR analysis to assess the synergetic effects of ICD combinations on macrophage activation. Our approach uncovered a novel CD40-LY9-FCRL1 chimeric receptor that modulates the tumor microenvironment and improves solid tumor clearance. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that pooled screening can accelerate the discovery of complex ICD constructs, providing a powerful platform for engineering macrophage-based immunotherapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".