76 THE ALLEVIATING EFFECT OF BASKETBALL ON SOCIAL WITHDRAWAL AND EMOTIONAL DELAY IN PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background In recent years, as a serious mental disorder, the treatment and rehabilitation of schizophrenia have become a focus of attention in the medical community. Schizophrenia patients often suffer from symptoms such as social withdrawal and emotional delay, which seriously affect their quality of life. Previous studies have shown that physical activity has a certain positive effect on the rehabilitation of patients with schizophrenia. Basketball, as a team sport, can not only exercise the body, but also improve patients’ social and emotional expression abilities. However, there is still a lack of research on the alleviating effect of basketball on social withdrawal and emotional delay in patients with schizophrenia. Therefore, the study aims to explore the alleviating effect of basketball on social withdrawal and emotional delay in patients with schizophrenia, providing new ideas and methods for the rehabilitation of schizophrenia patients. Methods The study recruited a total of 100 patients with schizophrenia as research subjects, aged between [18, 55] years old, all of whom met the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and were in a stable state of illness. Randomly divide the patients into an experimental group and a control group, with 50 people in each group. The experimental group of patients participated in an 8-week basketball intervention program, with 4 basketball training and activities per week, each lasting 50 minutes. The content of basketball includes basic dribbling, passing, shooting exercises, and simple team games. The activity venue is selected in a professional indoor basketball court, organized and guided by experienced sports coaches and psychiatric medical staff to ensure safety and standardization during the sports process. The control group patients only received routine psychiatric care and rehabilitation guidance at the same time, and did not participate in basketball sports. During the experiment, the Social Retention Seale (SRS) and Toronto Alexios Scale (TAS) were used to evaluate the degree of social withdrawal and emotional delay in patients. Results The comparison of scores between the experimental group before and after intervention showed that after 12 weeks of basketball training, the SRS score of the experimental group decreased from 75.36 ± 8.52 points before intervention to 46.27 ± 6.69 points after intervention, and the TAS score decreased from 72.14 ± 7.86 points before intervention to 52.53 ± 5.12 points after intervention. The SRS score and TAS score of the control group showed little change before and after intervention. The statistical analysis results showed that the SRS score and AES score of the experimental group after intervention were significantly different from those before intervention (P<0.001), and basketball training had a positive and significant impact on patients. Discussion Basketball has a significant alleviating effect on social withdrawal and emotional delay in patients with schizophrenia, and has important practical value. In terms of clinical rehabilitation treatment, basketball can be considered as an auxiliary treatment method in the rehabilitation plan of patients with schizophrenia, which can help improve their social and emotional expression abilities, thereby enhancing their social function and quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".