MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407684968 · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2025.02.021

Web-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in cancer survivors: The OncoSleep randomized trial

2025· article· en· W4407684968 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Inês Clara, Annemieke van Straten, Josée Savard, María Cristina Canavarro, Ana Allen Gomes

Bibliographic record

VenueSleep Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaLiga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialInsomniaCognitive behavioral therapy for insomniaCognitive behavioral therapyCognitionMedicineClinical psychologyPsychotherapistPsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Insomnia is highly prevalent among cancer survivors and can have serious implications if inadequately treated. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is recommended as the first-line treatment for insomnia but is rarely available to cancer survivors. We tested the effectiveness of a web-based CBT-I program, OncoSleep, in cancer survivors. METHODS: Cancer survivors with insomnia (n = 154) were randomly assigned (1:1) to digital CBT-I (6 weekly self-guided modules plus online clinician support) or a waitlist control group. Patient-reported outcome measures of insomnia severity (primary outcome), daytime functioning, and sleep diaries were administered online at baseline and post-treatment (8 weeks). Intention-to-treat analyses were performed using mixed-effects models. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The treatment group reported an average 11.0-point reduction in the Insomnia Severity index (ISI), compared to a 1.4-point reduction in the control group (p<.001). Statistically significant group-by-time interactions were observed: web-based CBT-I produced significant, large effects for improvements in insomnia severity (d = -2.56), cognitive functioning (d = 0.95), physical (d = 1.24) and psychological quality of life (d = 0.80), and fatigue (d = -1.35). Small-to-large effect sizes were found for reductions in anxiety (d = -0.77), depression (d = -0.71), and pain (d = -0.40). Change in insomnia severity mediated the effect of digital CBT-I on daytime outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based CBT-I with clinician support appears to be an effective treatment for insomnia in cancer survivors, offering meaningful benefits for comorbid symptoms and quality of life. Further studies with active comparisons and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings. Digital CBT-I could be integrated into cancer rehabilitation programs to reduce the burden of insomnia. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04898855].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSleep MedicineSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207