Efficacy and safety of high-dose and personalized TBS on post-stroke cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairments are prevalent among stroke patients, impacting independent living. While intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) shows potential for rehabilitation, the efficacy of the commonly-used doses remains unsatisfactory. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, dose-dependent effect, and safety of high-dose iTBS targeting the individualized frontoparietal cognitive network (FCN) for post-stroke cognitive recovery. METHODS: In a randomized, sham-controlled, three-arm trial, patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) received 15 days of high-dose (3600 pulses/day), standard low-dose (1200 pulses/day) as an active control, or sham iTBS targeting the individualized FCN, alongside cognitive training. Primary outcome measured changes in global cognition via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary measures included MoCA response rates and score changes in the Wechsler Memory Scale, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and Mini-Mental State Examination. RESULTS: Of forty-five randomized participants, forty-one (8 women; mean [SD] age, 58.63 [8.64] years) were analyzed. Personalized targeting improved focality by 33.0 % over the standard F3 target in E-field analysis. Both high-dose and standard low-dose groups showed significant improvements in MoCA. Importantly, the high-dose group demonstrated superior cognitive recovery over both the active control group (estimated difference = 2.50, p = 0.0339, 95 % CI = 0.15-4.84) and the sham control group (estimated difference = 4.29, p = 0.0001, 95 % CI = 1.99-6.60), indicating a superior effect of high-dose stimulation for cognitive recovery. Similar high-dose and dose-dependent effects were observed in other secondary outcomes, suggesting consistent effects on the memory, intelligence, and mental state. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the efficacy and safety of high-dose iTBS targeting the individualized FCN for post-stroke cognitive recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".