MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407685201 · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.02.012

Changes in olive oil consumption and long-term body weight changes in 3 United States prospective cohort studies

2025· article· en· W4407685201 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Guasch‐Ferré, Lorena S. Pacheco, Anne‐Julie Tessier, Yanping Li, Walter C. Willett, Qi Sun, Jordi Salas‐Salvadó, Miguel Ángel Martínez‐González, M. J. Stampfer, Frank B. Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteHarvard UniversityNovo Nordisk FondenKøbenhavns UniversitetNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsTerm (time)Prospective cohort studyConsumption (sociology)CohortOlive oilOil consumptionCohort studyMedicineEnvironmental healthDemographyInternal medicineFood scienceChemistryArtEngineeringPhysicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Olive oil intake is inversely associated with risk of cardiometabolic diseases. However, its energy density has raised concerns about weight gain. OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between long-term changes in olive oil consumption and changes in body weight in three prospective cohort studies. METHODS: We examined data from 121,119 females and males from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS, 1990-2010), NHSII (1991-2015), and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS, 1990-2014), aged 65 y or younger and who were free from chronic disease at baseline. We assessed the associations between changes in olive oil intake within each 4-y interval and concurrent body weight changes using multivariable linear regression models. Results across the 3 cohorts were pooled using inverse-variance weights. RESULTS: ) was between 25.9 and 26.1 across the 3 cohorts. The mean weight change over each of the 4-y follow-up cycles was highest in the NHSII (1.8 kg; 95% CI [confidence interval]: -6.8, 11.3 kg), followed by the NHS (1.2 kg; 95% CI: -6.8, 9.1 kg), and lastly the health professionals follow-up study HPFS (0.9 kg; 95% CI: -5.4, 7.3 kg). After multivariable adjustment, each ½ tablespoon (7 g) serving per day increment in olive oil consumption was inversely associated with body weight (β coefficient: -0.09 kg, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.08 kg; P < 0.0001). In contrast, each 7 g serving per day increase in other types of added fat (vegetable oils, butter, and margarine) was positively associated with changes in body weight. Results were consistent in stratified analyses by age and BMI. In substitution analyses, replacing margarine, butter, and other vegetable oils with equal amounts of olive oil was associated with less weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: A long-term increase in olive oil intake was inversely associated with body weight in middle-aged adults in the United States. Conversely, increased consumption of other added fats, such as butter and margarine, was positively associated with body weight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical NutritionSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207