MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effective Capacity of Internet of Underwater Things Networks Enabled By Multi-Aperture UOWC

2024· article· en· W4407691119 on OpenAlexaff
Ziyaur Rahman, Imene Romdhane, Md. Zoheb Hassan, Georges Kaddoum

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderwaterInternet of ThingsComputer scienceThe InternetAperture (computer memory)Computer networkComputer securityGeologyWorld Wide WebPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) is the underwater network of connected objects and systems that have a wide range of applications, ranging from undersea critical infrastructure monitoring and marine biodiversity observation to underwater surveillance. Underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) systems, which are characterized by large bandwidth and high data rate, are a key enabler of IoUT networks. However, oceanic turbulence and pointing error (PE) are essential performance limiting factors for enabling UOWC in IoUT networks. In this paper, we investigate the quality-of-service (QoS) performance of multi-aperture UOWC-based IoUT networks while adopting the mixture exponential-generalized gamma (EGG) distribution to jointly model the oceanic turbulence fading and PE. To this end, we derive a closed-form expression of the effective capacity (EC) from evaluating the system’s maximum achievable data rate in the presence of EGG turbulence and PE subject to certain statistical delay constraints. Special cases of the EC for asymptotic high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regimes and loose statistical delay constraints are also analyzed. Through extensive simulations, we justify the validity of the derived EC expressions. Our numerical results also demonstrate that the multi-aperture technique improves EC in the EGC turbulence fading and PE channels, thereby supporting strict statistical delay constraints with a high data rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207