MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407691132 · doi:10.1136/jech-2024-223176

Income inequality and adherence to 24-hour movement guideline recommendations among adolescents: a multilevel growth curve analysis using longitudinal data from three waves of the Cannabis, Obesity, Mental health, Physical activity, Sedentary behaviour and Smoking (COMPASS) study (2016–2019)

2025· article· en· W4407691132 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Stephen Hunter, Zack Perala, Karen A. Patte, Scott T. Leatherdale, Valerie Carson, Jean‐Philippe Chaput, Guy Faulkner, Roman Pabayo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaUniversity of WaterlooBrock UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersInstitute of Population and Public HealthInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and DiabetesWomen and Children's Health Research InstituteHealth CanadaCanada Research ChairsStollery Children’s Hospital FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsObesityDemographyScreen timeMedicineEconomic inequalityBody mass indexHousehold incomeGerontologyMental healthPsychologyInequalityPsychiatryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of literature regarding income inequality and adolescent movement behaviours (physical activity, sedentary behaviours, sleep). This study examined whether income inequality was associated with meeting Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines (24HMG) recommendations among adolescents over time. METHODS: Longitudinal data from adolescents (n=9299) in the Cannabis, Obesity, Mental health, Physical activity, Sedentary behaviour and Smoking study (2016-2017 to 2018-2019) were linked with income data at the census division (CD) level from the 2016 Canadian Census. Adolescents (aged 13-19 years) reported on their physical activity, sleep duration and screen time via questionnaire. Gini coefficients were calculated at the CD level using after-tax household income from the 2016 Canadian Census. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association between income inequality and meeting several 24HMG recommendations. RESULTS: The joint effect (income inequality*time) was significant for meeting the sleep duration recommendation (2017-2018 OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.74, 0.92; 2018-2019 OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.70, 0.86; p<0.0001), meeting any two recommendations over time (2017-2018 OR=0.97, 95% CI 0.86, 1.09; 2018-2019 OR=0.85, 95% CI 0.75, 0.97; p=0.0402) and meeting combined sleep and physical activity recommendations (2017-2018 OR=0.93, 95% CI 0.82, 1.06; 2018-2019 OR=0.82, 95% CI 0.71, 0.94; p=0.0200). Joint effects (income inequality*time) were not significant (p>0.05) for screen time or physical activity independently of sleep. CONCLUSION: Adolescents attending schools in areas with greater income inequality may be at higher risk for inadequate sleep and combined short sleep and physical inactivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Epidemiology & Community HealthSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207