eLife Assessment: An adaptable, reusable, and light implant for chronic Neuropixels probes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Certain cognitive processes, such as learning, develop over relatively long periods (hours or days). Others, including navigation – the ability to move through a space based on our knowledge of it – usually take place when the subject is free to explore its environment. This can make studying these processes challenging, as researchers need to record brain activity for long periods and in freely moving subjects. Electrophysiology allows researchers to record brain activity at the millisecond timescale, but technical constraints have made it difficult to record more than a few neurons for any length of time. However, a set of electrophysiology probes called Neuropixels have been developed to allow the recording of hundreds of neurons at once. These probes can be permanently implanted in the brain to track neural activity over long periods. Unfortunately, these implants make it impossible to recover the probes, making their use too expensive for most researchers. To address this issue, Bimbard et al. set out to develop an implant that would allow the reversible implantation of Neuropixel probes, allowing researchers to track hundreds of cells at fast timescales and over long periods. The device they developed, called the Apollo implant, is a lightweight, reusable device with an open-source design that can be adjusted to suit experimental needs. Bimbard et al. combined data from eight independent laboratories using the Apollo implant to demonstrate that it can be easily reproduced and modified. These data show that the implant can measure neural data stably for over 100 days after the initial implantation. Additionally, Bimbard et al. show that it is possible to reimplant the same probes many times without losing recording quality. The Apollo implant makes long-term tracking of groups of neurons reliable and affordable, which will facilitate cognition studies across different model systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".