NEO-BLAST: Neoadjuvant therapy for bladder cancer followed by active surveillance vs treatment.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS890 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Approximately 35-40% of patients have no residual cancer at the time of surgery, suggesting that these patients could potentially avoid definitive bladder treatments (DBT), including RC or trimodal therapy (TMT). However, the current clinical tools used to detect residual disease prior to cystectomy are inadequate. The question remains whether patients with complete response (CR) require DBT or if active surveillance (AS) could be a safe alternative. The NEO-BLAST trial investigates whether a combination of bladder MRI, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) and transurethral bladder tumor resection (TURBT) can accurately identify MIBC patients with a clinical CR (cCR) following NAT, and whether AS is non-inferior to standard of care (SOC) in those who achieved cCR. Methods: This is a multicenter, phase II/III, non-inferiority open-label clinical trial that will randomize patients with MIBC who achieve cCR after NAT to AS versus SOC DBT, including either RC or trimodal therapy (TMT) (NCT06537154). The primary endpoint is feasibility of randomization for the phase II pilot-RCT, and metastasis-free survival (MFS) at two years for the phase III. Eligible patients will be adults with non-metastatic MIBC (≥T2, N0M0) who are candidates to SOC NAT followed by DBT as per the current practice. After enrolment, ctDNA and utDNA will be collected. Only participants who complete SOC NAT will then undergo a comprehensive clinical restaging process, including repeat ctDNA and utDNA, bladder mpMRI, urine cytology, and TURBT with template biopsies. Participants meeting criteria for cCR, defined as negative ctDNA, utDNA, MRI, and TURBT, will be randomized to either AS-arm or DBT-arm, while those without cCR will receive SOC. Participants will be monitored with cystoscopy and urine cytology (if bladder in situ) every three months for 2 years, along with ctDNA and imaging at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The pilot-RCT will plan to enrol 72 patients, and if 25% is found to have cCR and accept to be randomized, the trial will be considered feasible. Assuming a 5% event rate at 2 years (MFS) in both groups and a type I error of 5% (1-sided), 78 per group will provide 80% power to reject the hypothesis of inferiority. We anticipate enrolling 688 patients for the phase 3 to have a total of 172 patients with cCR randomized, assuming 10% lost to follow-up. An independent Data Monitoring Committee will oversee safety and efficacy throughout the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT06537154 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".