MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of adherence to a remote exercise program on health-related quality of life in prostate cancer patients undergoing treatment: A prospective study in Brazil.

2025· article· en· W4407699446 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paulo Gustavo Bergerot, Cristiane Decat Bergerot, Jonas Ribeiro Gomes Silva, Marcos V S Franca, Paulo Sergio Lages, William Hiromi Fuzita, Enrique Soto‐Pérez‐de‐Celis, Narjust Florez, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Sumanta K. Pal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHealthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerQuality of life (healthcare)CancerProspective cohort studyPhysical therapyProstateOncologyGerontologyInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

130 Background: Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) undergoing treatment often experience declines in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and increased symptom burden. Exercise interventions are known to mitigate these effects, but adherence to such programs remains a challenge. This study aimed to assess the impact of adherence to a remote, home-based exercise program on HRQoL and symptom burden among patients with mPCa in a joint cancer practice in Brazil. Methods: This prospective study recruited patients with mPCa undergoing active treatment for both hormone sensitive and hormone resistant disease. Patients were assessed at baseline (T1) and after 12 weeks (T2) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G; scale: 0-108) and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS; scale: 0-90). Eligible participants received weekly exercise guidance through WhatsApp and performed prescribed exercise regimens (3 to 5 hours per week of combined resistance and aerobic training), with proper techniques demonstrated using the Vedius platform. Adherence was categorized as moderate to high (MH) ≥6 weeks of exercise, or low (L) ≤5 weeks. The primary outcomes included changes in HRQoL and symptom burden. Results: A total of 35 patients were recruited. The median age of participants was 74 years (range 58-91), with a majority being white (65.7%), married (82.9%), highly educated (88.6%), and retired (85.7%). All patients were receiving ADT plus abiraterone (34.3%), or docetaxel (25.7%), or enzalutamide (22.8%), or chemotherapy + abiraterone (14.3%). At 12 weeks, patients with moderate to high adherence demonstrated significant improvements in HRQoL (MH Mean T2 =94.9, L Mean T2 =88.7, P=0.01), particularly in physical (MH Mean T2 =25.1, Mean T2 =23.6, P=0.03), functional (MH Mean T2 =22.8, L Mean T2 =20.7, P=0.03), and emotional (MH Mean T2 =22.2, L Mean T2 =20.28, P=0.03) well-being domains, compared to those with low adherence. Additionally, those with higher adherence reported a lower symptom burden (MH Mean T2 =9.1 vs L Mean T2 =14.7, P=01). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that adherence to a remote exercise program significantly improves HRQoL and reduces symptom burden in patients with prostate cancer undergoing treatment. These findings underscore the importance of promoting exercise adherence through accessible platforms, such as WhatsApp, to enhance patient outcomes in mPCa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.569
Teacher spread0.408 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHealthcare during COVID-19 PandemicFrench-language works237,207