MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phase 2 randomized study of high-risk metachronous oligometastatic prostate cancer with high-risk mutations treated with metastasis-directed therapy and niraparib/abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (KNIGHTS) trial.

2025· article· en· W4407700106 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew P. Deek, Xiaolei Shi, Noura Radwan, C. Eggleston, Kaysee Baker, Zaker Rana, Matthew J. Ferris, Young Kwok, Søren M. Bentzen, Ronald D. Ennis, Lara Hathout, Biren Saraiya, Tina Mayer, Heather D. Mannuel, Arif Hussain, Matthew C. Abramowitz, Alejandro Berlín, Mark V. Mishra, Phuoc T. Tran, Jason K. Molitoris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbiraterone acetateMedicinePrednisoneProstate cancerOncologyAbirateroneInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialCancerProstateGynecologyAndrogen deprivation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS283 Background: Some patients with oligometastases may have the potential for long-term disease-free survival with just aggressive local therapy as shown by randomized trials for total consolidation of macroscopic metastases using metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). Long-term outcomes of pooled STOMP and ORIOLE trials in oligorecurrent metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) demonstrated MDT improved progression free survival. However, men with high-risk mutations, including pathogenic alterations in ATM , BRCA1/2 , Rb1 , and TP53 , did poorly. Additional data suggests men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and similar mutations are sensitive to PARP inhibition (PARPi) with niraparib. We are launching a first-in-man biomarker-driven trial in omCSPC patients with high-risk mutations to evaluate the efficacy of MDT + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus MDT + ADT + niraparib/abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (nira/AAP). Methods: This study is a multi-site, non-blinded, randomized phase II trial in patients with omCSPC. Men with histologically confirmed (at any site) omCSPC (≤3 metastases on standard imaging or ≤5 on Axumin/Choline/PSMA-PET/CT) and germ-line/somatic high-risk mutations ( TP53, BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2, FANCA, RAD51B, RAD54L, MUTYH ) will be randomized (1:1) to MDT + 6- months ADT versus MDT + 6-months ADT + 6-months nira/AAP. A range of MDT radiation fractionation regimens are permitted. Subjects who meet eligibility criteria and qualify for enrollment will be stratified according to: (i) institution; (ii) conventional/enhanced imaging, (iii) PSADT <6-months, (iv) initial surgery/radiation, and (v) BRCA1/2 status. This study has been IRB approved (NCT06212583). We assume an accrual time of 24 months, with 18 months of additional follow-up time, and will randomize a total of 88 patients (44 patients in each arm). The primary endpoint will be to assess frequency of PSA failure (> 0.2 ng/mL post primary surgery or nadir + 2 post definitive radiation) with testosterone >100 ng/dl at 18-months after randomization (powered for 20% improvement over control arm by Fisher’s exact test). Secondary endpoints will include toxicity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), time to locoregional progression, time to distant progression, time to new metastasis, radiographic progression-free survival, and duration of response. Discovery correlatives associated with clinical outcome will be assessed by collection of including, but not limited to, cell free DNA, circulating-tumor cells, immunologic biomarkers, microbiota and radiomics. Clinical trial information: NCT06212583 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→