MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The prognostic impact of prostate-specific antigen at 6 months after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy: An individual patient data analysis of two NRG oncology randomized trials.

2025· article· en· W4407700214 on OpenAlexaff
Osama Mohamad, David Swanson, Alan Pollack, Himanshu Lukka, Alan Dal Pra, Ian S. Dayes, André‐Guy Martin, Michael J. Greenberg, Alexander G. Balogh, Jeff M. Michalski, Peter Vavassis, Adam Currey, Robert T. Dess, Jason A. Efstathiou, Nirav S. Kapadia, Samir Patel, Belal Ahmad, Howard M. Sandler, Stephanie L. Pugh, Paul L. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité LavalCancer Care OntarioJuravinski Cancer CentreMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstatectomyRadiation therapyProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenOncologyProstateInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialUrologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

254 Background: We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) within 6 months of completion of salvage radiotherapy (RT) in patients treated with RT with or without hormone therapy (HT). Methods: Individual patient data were obtained from 2 randomized trials (NRG’s RTOG 0534 and RTOG 9601) evaluating salvage RT with or without HT. HT was either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 4-6 months or bicalutamide for 2 years. The lowest PSA recorded within 6 months after RT completion was identified and categorized as ≤ or >0.1 ng/mL. The primary outcomes were metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals to characterize the association of PSA within 6 months post-RT completion with OS and MFS while adjusting for age, Gleason score, trial, and HT use. Five-year MFS and 10-year OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among a total of 2,373 patients, 1833 (77%) patients achieved a nadir PSA ≤0.1 and 540 (23%) did not. Among patients who did not get HT, 50% did not reach the milestone compared to only 6% of patients who got HT. PSA ≤0.1 ng/mL was associated with better OS (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.12-0.6], p=0.001) and better MFS (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.13-0.47], p<0.0001). The interaction test showed that the improved OS/MFS in patients who achieved the nadir was more prominent in those who did not receive HT compared to those who received HT. Five-year MFS rates among patients allocated to RT, RT+ADT, and RT+ bicalutamide were 94% vs 81%, 92% vs 87%, and 91% vs 93%, respectively, based on PSA ≤ vs >0.1. Ten-year OS rates among patients allocated to RT, RT+ADT, and RT+ bicalutamide were 87% vs 76%, 84% vs 84%, and 82% vs 83%, respectively, based on PSA ≤ vs >0.1. Conclusions: PSA >0.1 ng/mL within 6 months was prognostic for OS and MFS in patients treated with salvage RT in the post-prostatectomy setting. This finding allows better patient counseling and can guide clinical trial design for treatment intensification or de-intensification in patients receiving salvage RT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.011
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→