Effect of combined aerobic exercise and cognitive training in older adults with post‑stroke cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cognitive impairment affects >50% of individuals who survive for 6 months following a stroke.Cognitive impairment not only reduces the ability of patients to relearn motor skills due to memory problems or poor judgment, but also significantly impairs daily living activities and quality of life.Early intervention in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) not only improves cognition, but also attenuates the progression to dementia.The present controlled prospective study included 38 older adults with post-stroke MCI, who were assigned to the intervention group (aerobic + cognitive exercise) and the control group (cognitive exercise).Both groups participated in 60-min sessions, three times per week, for 12 weeks (4 weeks in the hospital and 8 weeks at home).The intervention group exhibited a significant improvement in cognitive function (Montreal cognitive assessment and frontal assessment battery, P<0.05), as well as in physical function and quality of life, compared to the control group.On the whole, the present study demonstrates that the combination of aerobic and cognitive exercise is beneficial leading to improvements in the cognitive function, physical function and quality of life of individuals with post-stroke MCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".