An Algebraic Preconditioner for the Exactly Divergence‐Free Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Stokes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT We present an algebraic preconditioner for the exactly divergence‐free discontinuous Galerkin (DG) discretization of Cockburn, Kanschat, and Schötzau [ J. Sci. Comput. , 31 (2007), pp. 61–73] and Wang and Ye [ SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 45 (2007), pp. 1269–1286] for the Stokes problem. The exactly divergence‐free DG method uses finite elements that use an ‐conforming basis, thereby significantly complicating its solution by iterative methods. Several preconditioners for this Stokes discretization has been developed, but each is based on specialized solvers or decompositions. To avoid requiring custom solvers, we hybridize the ‐conforming finite element so that the velocity lives in a standard ‐DG space, and present a simple algebraic preconditioner for the extended hybridized system. The proposed preconditioner is optimal in mesh size , effective in 2d and 3d, and only relies on standard relaxation and algebraic multigrid methods available in many packages. Furthermore, the Schur complement approximation is robust in element order , although more AMG cycles are needed on the velocity block when increasing .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it