Altered resting-state amplitudes of low-frequency fluctuations in offspring of parents with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) or major depressive disorder (MDD) are at high biological risk (HR) of these disorders given their significant heritability. Thus, studying neural correlates in youths at HR-MDD and HR-BD appears essential to understand the development of mood disorders before their onset. Resting-state amplitudes of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and fractioned ALFF (fALFF) shows moderate to high test-retest reliability which makes it a great tool to identify biomarkers. However, this avenue is still largely unexplored. Using the Healthy Brain Network biobank, we identified 150 children and adolescents HR-MDD, 50 HR-BD and 150 not at risk of any psychiatric disorder (i.e., the control group). We then examined differences in relative ALFF/fALFF signals during resting-state. At a corrected threshold, participants HR-MDD displayed lower resting-state ALFF signals in the dorsal caudate nucleus compared to the control group. The HR-BD group showed increased fALFF values in the primary motor cortex compared to the control group. Therefore, robust differences were noted in regions that could be linked to important symptoms of mood disorders, namely psychomotor retardation, and agitation. At an uncorrected threshold, differences were noted in the central opercular cortex and the cerebellar. The database is a community-referred cohort and heterogeneous in terms of children's psychiatric diagnosis and symptomatology, which may have altered the results. ALFF and fALFF results for the comparison between both HR groups and the control group overlapped, suggesting good convergence. More studies measuring ALFF/fALFF in HR are needed to replicate these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".