MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407736596 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3543632

BOOST: A Connected Dominant Set-Aware Energy-Efficient Scheme for Software Defined Connected Autonomous Vehicular Networks

2025· article· en· W4407736596 on OpenAlexaff
Anushka Nehra, Deepanshu Garg, Rasmeet Singh Bali, Kshirasagar Naik

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Computer networkSoftwareSet (abstract data type)Software-defined radioDistributed computingTelecommunicationsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, advancements in vehicular communication has improved road safety along with passenger convenience for many applications. However, to take intelligent and timely decisions, a large number of complex operations need to be get executed on large amount of data base repositories which in turn generates a huge burden on the underlying network infrastructure leading to a large amount of energy consumption. Most of the existing solutions reported for the aforementioned problems are based upon the traditional monolithic solutions which may not be applicable in modern scenarios in this environment. Hence, to mitigate the aforementioned challenges and constraints, in this article, we propose BOOST, a connected dominating set (CDS)-aware energy-efficient clustering scheme for Software Defined Network by integrating V2I and V2V communications for reliable and seamless data delivery. The proposed scheme has been specifically designed for urban scenario to achieve effective data delivery with minimum energy consumption. By leveraging the benefits of CDS on roadside communication infrastructure, BOOST is able to adapt with varying traffic conditions to provide seamless scalability with minimum energy and network overheads. The proposed scheme has been evaluated using various performance evaluation metrics in comparison to the existing benchmark schemes. The results obtained demonstrate its superior performance by 3% to 4% in terms of energy-efficiency, network overhead, packet delivery rate, and network throughput in comparison to the existing benchmark schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207