MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Field Data-Driven Discrete-Event Simulation of Residential PV/ Energy Storage Systems in Cold Climate Regions

2025· article· en· W4407737064 on OpenAlexaff
Hadia Awad, Ajit Pardasani, Jennifer A. Veitch, Sara Mudge

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsEnergie NB Power (Canada)National Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemDiscrete event simulationEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceField (mathematics)Transient climate simulationEvent (particle physics)Climate changeMeteorologyClimate modelSimulationEngineeringGeographyElectrical engineeringPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a field data-driven simulation model for PV and battery systems in residential buildings. The in-creased electricity demand in buildings, particularly in morning and evening peak periods, has increased the need for optimized on-site renewable energy utilization. A battery system's output de-pends on various parameters, including occupant energy use be-havior, load profile, operation mode, state of charge, battery man-agement system programming, and weather conditions. This pa-per addresses the gap by proposing a discrete-event simulation model based on field data collected from 75 homes in Atlantic Can-ada. The model replicates the performance of PV and battery sys-tems under time-based control mode. Validation of the model demonstrates promising results. The evidence-based model can in-form utility companies, ratepayers, and stakeholders about the costs and benefits of implementing battery energy storage systems and provides insights for developing decarbonization plans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy Management→French-language works237,207→