MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407740177 · doi:10.1093/ismejo/wraf032

Lysis of <i>Escherichia coli</i> by colicin Ib contributes to bacterial cross-feeding by releasing active β-galactosidase

2025· article· en· W4407740177 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole Lerminiaux, Laura J Schnell, Sean D. Workman, Danae M. Suchan, Carsten Kröger, Brian Ingalls, Andrew D. S. Cameron

Bibliographic record

VenueThe ISME Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEvolution and Genetic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of Regina
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesBader PhilanthropiesInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthUniversities Space Research Association
KeywordsSalmonella entericaBiologyEscherichia coliColicinMicrobiologyPopulationEnterobacteriaceaeLactoseBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diffusible toxin ColIb produced by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium SL1344 is a potent inhibitor of Escherichia coli growth. To identify and parameterize metabolic cross-feeding in states of competition, we established defined communities in which E. coli was the only species able to access a sole carbon source, lactose. Although ColIb was predicted to undermine cross-feeding by killing the lactose-converting E. coli, S. enterica populations thrived in co-culture. We discovered that ColIb caused the release of active β-galactosidase from E. coli cells, which induced galactose uptake by S. enterica. Although iron limitation stimulates ColIb production and makes E. coli more sensitive to the toxin, ColIb killing in iron-limited conditions did not enhance iron acquisition or siderophore scavenging by S. enterica. Also unexpected was the rapid rate at which resistance to ColIb evolved in E. coli through spontaneous mutation of the ColIb receptor gene cirA or horizontal acquisition of the S. enterica colicin immunity gene imm. Mathematical modelling effectively predicted the growth kinetics of E. coli and S. enterica populations, revealing a tractable system in which ColIb can shrink a competitor population while simultaneously amplifying the metabolic contributions of the suppressed population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe ISME JournalSame topicEvolution and Genetic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207