MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407742080 · doi:10.5751/ace-02807-200107

Use of alternate upland nesting habitat reduces brood parasitism in an endangered bird

2025· article· en· W4407742080 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kevin B. Clark, Kimberly Ferree

Bibliographic record

VenueAvian Conservation and Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrood parasiteEndangered speciesNesting (process)EcologyHabitatBroodParasitismGeographyBiologyHost (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) is a federally endangered songbird restricted to Southern California, USA, and Baja California, Mexico. Historically abundant, it suffered a catastrophic population decline during the twentieth century due to widespread habitat destruction and the arrival of Brown-headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) within its breeding range. We monitored Least Bell’s Vireo nests and conducted cowbird removals for over 13 years in a protected natural area along the Otay River in San Diego County, California. We evaluated the effects of lay date (day of the first egg laid in each nest), nest habitat (river channel versus adjacent upland terrace), and cowbird removals on Least Bell’s Vireo brood parasitism rates and nest success. Least Bell’s Vireos nested in 11 different host plant species, but over half of vireo nests were found in the upland shrub laurel sumac (Malosma laurina). We located and monitored 177 Least Bell’s Vireo nests, of which 20% were parasitized. The rate of parasitized nests was strongly associated with whether cowbird removals had occurred that season (9%) or had not (35%), despite the low number of female cowbirds removed annually (1–4 females per year). We also found that nests located in the upland terrace had a lower parasitism rate compared to the river channel (12% vs. 29%), with this difference more pronounced in years without cowbird removals. These differences in parasitism rates also drove differences in nest success; only 29% of channel nests were successful versus 48% of nests on the terrace. The best model predicting cowbird brood parasitism included lay date, cowbird removals, and nest habitat (river channel versus upland terrace). Thus, recovering populations of Least Bell’s Vireos may benefit by nesting outside of riparian habitats in adjacent upland habitat due to reduced cowbird parasitism rates. Conservation and restoration of upland habitats adjacent to riparian areas may provide refugia from cowbird parasitism, allowing for continued population increases in areas with limited funding for cowbird management. Conservation of upland habitats will also increase habitat available to Least Bell’s Vireos under future drier climate scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvian Conservation and EcologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207