MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407745224 · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01193-2

Examining maladaptive eating behaviors and psychological difficulties among women with compulsive eating and obesity: a latent profile analysis

2025· article· en· W4407745224 on OpenAlex
Charlie Maltais-Lévesque, Maxime Legendre, Catherine Bégin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Eating Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationUniversité Laval
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDisinhibitionOverweightObesityImpulsivityClinical psychologyDisordered eatingPsychologyMultivariate analysis of varianceBinge eatingEating disordersOvereatingPsychiatryMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Maladaptive eating behaviors are central to weight gain and are influenced by various psychological determinants associated with obesity. While some studies have established profiles based on different maladaptive eating behaviors using medical samples of individuals with obesity, no studies have focused on all patients with overweight or obesity seeking psychological help for compulsive eating. The objective was to identify eating behaviors profiles using maladaptive eating behaviors (disinhibition, susceptibility to hunger, and restraint) among women patients with compulsive eating and overweight or obesity, and to compare those profiles with each other on socio-demographic, clinical, psychological, and eating-related variables. METHODS: ) completed online questionnaires and participated in an eating disorders diagnosis interview. Profiles were created using latent profile analysis and compared with a MANOVA with Tukey adjusted post-hoc comparisons and a chi-square analysis. RESULTS: Three profiles emerged from the latent profile analysis. The Highly disinhibited profile includes women with high scores for disinhibition and susceptibility to hunger and a low score of restraint. The Moderate sensitivity to eating cues profile includes women with moderate scores of disinhibition, susceptibility to hunger, and restraint. The Perceived control over food profile includes women with the highest restraint score and the lowest levels of disinhibition and susceptibility to hunger. Group comparisons showed significant differences between profiles. The Highly disinhibited profile included women with higher levels of depressive symptoms and impulsivity as well as lower scores of self-directedness and cooperation. This profile also showed the highest level of binge eating, food craving, and food addiction symptoms. The Moderate sensitivity to eating cues profile showed more body esteem and greater cooperation. The Perceived control over food profile had less impulsivity and depressive symptoms as well as a higher level of self-directedness. CONCLUSION: These results highlighted mechanisms that seem to prevail in different profiles of patients with compulsive eating which offer intervention targets that should be prioritized when offering psychotherapeutic treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it