MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407750353 · doi:10.3126/oodbodhan.v7i1.75764

Design, Development, and Analysis of Combined Darrieus and Savonius Wind Turbine

2024· article· en· W4407750353 on OpenAlexaff
Hem Raj Joshi, Ashish Kumar Bhattarai, Bishnu Bhatta, Nabin Neupane

Bibliographic record

VenueOODBODHAN · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarine engineeringTurbineWind powerEnvironmental scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study concerns the design, development, and analysis of the combined Darrieus and Savonius wind turbine. The circumferential placement of three straight Darrieus blades with a NACA 0018 cross-section and a helically twisted Savonius blade ensures an even distribution of torque. Savonius can be used to self-start a wind turbine, something that the Darrieus cannot do on its own due to its unique design. All the wind turbine parts are designed using CAD software, and simulation data is obtained via the CFD approach. Also, the design is imported to FlashForge Finder to 3D print the wind turbine profile, and finally, testing is carried out. The plastic material used for Savonius is ABS, and that for Darrieus is PLA. Equipped with a hybrid design, the fabricated VAWT has exhibited notable characteristics during testing. Its cut-in wind speed, which is the minimum required for operation, is remarkably low, at 3 m/s. Under 6 m/s wind conditions, it achieves a maximum power output of 7.5537 watts. Additionally, the rotor blade has registered a peak rotational speed of 431 rpm at 6 m/s, showcasing its promising potential for wind energy harnessing. Furthermore, a graph plot analysis of the data collected from both processes reveals a comparable slope characteristic. Additionally, mechanical losses have been demonstrated by the discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental data. The study investigates the performance of a novel wind turbine model equipped with an innovative self-starting mechanism, eliminating reliance on external motors, across a range of wind velocities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOODBODHANSame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207