MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407750550 · doi:10.32388/tl3ebk

CHD3 Regulates BMP Signalling Response During Cranial Neural Crest Cell Specification

2025· preprint· en· W4407750550 on OpenAlexaff
Willemijn Claassen, Martina Demurtas, Philippe M. Campeau, Karen Liu, Simon E. Fisher, Marco Trizzino

Bibliographic record

VenueQeios · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
KeywordsNeural crestSignallingCranial neural crestCell biologyCrestBone morphogenetic protein 2NeuroscienceBiologyGeneticsIn vitroEmbryo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CHD3 is a component of the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex. Pathogenic _CHD3_ variants cause Snijders Blok-Campeau Syndrome, a neurodevelopmental disorder with variable features including developmental delays, intellectual disability, speech/language difficulties, and craniofacial anomalies. To unveil the role of CHD3 in craniofacial development, we differentiated _CHD3_-KO induced pluripotent stem cells into cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs). CHD3 expression is low in wild-type iPSCs and neuroectoderm, but upregulated during CNCC specification, where it opens the chromatin at BMP-responsive enhancers, to allow binding of DLX5 and other factors. CHD3 loss leads to repression of BMP target genes and an imbalance between BMP and Wnt signalling, ultimately resulting in aberrant mesodermal fate. Consequently, CNCC specification fails, replaced by early-mesoderm identity, which can be partially rescued by titrating Wnt levels. Our findings highlight a novel role for CHD3 as a pivotal regulator of BMP signalling, essential for proper neural crest specification and craniofacial development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQeiosSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207