MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detrital zircon geochronology of the Paleoproterozoic Nonacho Basin (Northwest Territories, Canada): A record of post-collisional collapse amid supercontinent aggregation

2025· article· en· W4407756260 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jade Lockie, Alessandro Ielpi, S J Pehrsson, Joshua H.F.L. Davies, Beth J. Fischer

Bibliographic record

VenuePrecambrian Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalGeological Survey of CanadaGovernment of Northwest TerritoriesUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSupercontinentZirconGeologyGeochronologyStructural basinGeochemistryPaleontologyCratonTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• New maximum depositional age for the Nonacho Group of 1887 ± 10 Ma. • Erosional record of Taltson and Thelon orogens preserved in the Nonacho Basin. • Correlations with other Rae craton Paleoproterozoic supracrustal rocks. • Model of basin evolution in response to craton amalgamation. The study of Paleoproterozoic sedimentary basins is critical to inform aspects of craton development during some of Earth’s earliest supercontinent cycles. The ∼ 1.9 Ga Nonacho Basin is located at the ancestral core of the Canadian Shield near the sutured margins of the Archean Slave and Rae cratons, making it ideal for a detrital zircon study examining evidence of orogenic unroofing during the ca. 1.9 Ga assembly of the supercontinent Nuna. Detrital zircon U–Pb geochronology with chemical-abrasion laser-ablation inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry is used to investigate the provenance and maximum depositional ages of the Nonacho Group throughout its alluvial, fluvial and marine deposition. Detritus preserved in the lower stratigraphy (Hjalmar formation) was largely derived locally from the ∼ 2.7–2.3 Ga Nonacho basement complex. The overlying strata (Tronka Chua, Chief Nataway, Newshethdezza, Thekulthili, and Taltson formations) display distinctive age peaks matching the ∼ 2.0–1.9 Ga Thelon and Taltson orogens, together with contributions from varied source areas of the Rae craton. A maximum depositional age at 1887 ± 10 Ma for the Tronka Chua formation indicates that much of the sediment was deposited post ∼ 1.89 Ga, similarly to correlative supracrustal panels of the central Rae craton. This new depositional constraint, together with records of Taltson- and Thelon-derived detritus, corroborate a model whereby the Nonacho Basin evolved in a regime of crustal extension driven by thermal subsidence in the aftermath of the Slave and Rae craton collision, punctuated by crustal flexure as a distant response to the Snowbird orogeny. The Nonacho Group acted as a sink for sediment unroofed from nearby orogenic topography until crustal flexure originating from the Rae-Hearne craton boundary triggered alternate sources, providing an example of how multistage convergence during supercontinent amalgamation controls sediment provenance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrecambrian ResearchSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207