MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407761346 · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102438

Intelligent wearable system design for personalized knee motion and swelling monitoring in osteoarthritis care

2025· article· en· W4407761346 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports Physical Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersHong Kong Polytechnic University
KeywordsWearable computerOsteoarthritisComputer scienceMotion captureSwellingMedicineMotion (physics)Physical medicine and rehabilitationEmbedded systemArtificial intelligencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Daily knee monitoring is critical for osteoarthritis management, aiding in both prevention and rehabilitation. Current wearable solutions for daily use typically capture knee-bending angles as a single feature but lack evidence for comprehensive knee-state recognition. Here we introduce SyncKnee, a knee-monitoring system that tracks both joint angles and swelling patterns, providing detailed knee-state monitoring for daily use. SyncKnee consists of three components: a stretch sensor pad, a multi-modal machine-learning model, and personalized information support. The sensor, made from poly(SBS) fiber and eutectic gallium-indium alloy, tracks skin deformation from bending and swelling. Robotic-arm-driven tests confirm sensor accuracy in responding to bending and swelling. In the user study with 15 participants performing five distinct knee maneuvers, our system with a random forest model achieves 98.48% accuracy in recognizing knee behaviors. SyncKnee offers a comprehensive approach to knee monitoring with promising applications for daily osteoarthritis care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it