MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407767381 · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.062

Serum levels of D-cycloserine predict antidepressant effects in pharmacologically enhanced intermittent theta-burst stimulation

2025· article· en· W4407767381 on OpenAlexafffund
Marilena M. DeMayo, Molly Watson, Ashley D. Harris, Alexander McGirr

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAntidepressantStimulationCycloserinePsychologyPharmacologyNeuroscienceMedicineHippocampus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation is an important treatment option for treatment resistant major depressive disorder. Pairing stimulation with adjuncts such as the partial N-Methyl-d-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonist, D-Cycloserine, has emerged as a strategy to enhance treatment outcomes. However, the effects of D-Cycloserine are concentration dependent, and higher concentrations may blunt TMS-induced plasticity. This is clinically important due to the potential for accumulation with repeated dosing and individual differences in volume of distribution. METHODS: We recruited n = 12 individuals with a moderate-severe depressive episode for a pharmacokinetic characterization of repeated D-Cycloserine dosing in the context of a 4 week (20 treatments) open-label trial pairing intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) using a weight based dose of D-Cycloserine (25 mg/17.5 kg). Prior to treatment, we serially sampled peripheral blood with a 100 mg dose for comparison. Then, serum samples were characterized in conjunction with 25 mg/17.5 kg dosing for the first, the 5th (accumulation), and the 6th (elimination) doses. RESULTS: iTBS+D-Cycloserine was associated with a potent antidepressant effect, achieving 83.3 % response and 75.0 % remission at treatment end with no serious adverse events. Improvements in depressive symptoms were predicted by serum D-Cycloserine concentration. Although we found evidence for accumulation after five doses, the weekend hiatus was sufficient for elimination and the concentration remained within the NMDA receptor agonist range. Serum concentrations did not significantly differ between 100 mg and 25 mg/17.5 kg doses. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the antidepressant effects and safety of extended iTBS+D-Cycloserine, while highlighting the importance of adequate serum concentrations within the agonist range. Weight-based dosing may not be required by default.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Affective DisordersSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207