MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407776943 · doi:10.1016/j.wear.2025.205953

Mechanical properties and wear behaviors of lightweight Al3Ti-based medium-entropy alloys at elevated temperatures

2025· article· en· W4407776943 on OpenAlexafffund
Guijiang Diao, Anqiang He, Dong Zhang, Yunqing Tang, Yefei Zhou, Zhen Xu, Keyang Chen, Aakash Kumar, Seyed Elias Mousavi, Mingyu Wu, Wengang Chen, D.L. Chen, Dongyang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueWear · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsMaterials scienceHigh entropy alloysComposite materialMetallurgyForensic engineeringAlloyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Al 3 Ti-based medium-entropy alloys (MEAs) with improved high-temperature mechanical properties and wear resistance were fabricated using arc melting method via alloying Al 3 Ti with various amounts of Cr, Mn, Fe and Cu elements. The alloying elements, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Cu, transformed the brittle D0 22 structure into a ductile L1 2 structure, along with the formation of hard B2 and D8a second phases. The resultant combination of improved ductility and strength enhances the mechanical performance of the material. A representative alloy, Al 60 Ti 20 Cr 5 Mn 5 Fe 5 Cu 5 , achieved high yield strength and high hardness of 442 MPa and 270HV2 at even 500 °C. Wear tests showed that the Al 3 Ti-based MEAs distinctly outperformed conventional Al-matrix composite reinforced with 30 wt% of SiC particles at both room temperature and 300 °C. The ordered L1 2 , B2, and D8a phases not only led to good room-temperature strength and hardness, but also contributed to high thermal stability, contrasting with solid solution alloys, resulting in superior high-temperature performance. The results highlight Al 3 Ti-based MEAs as competitive candidates for medium-temperature applications, bridging the gap between aluminum and titanium alloys in engineering applications. • Lightweight Al 3 Ti-based medium-entropy alloys (MEAs) were designed, fabricated and investigated. • Alloying Al 3 Ti with Cr, Mn, Fe, and Cu transformed D022 Al 3 Ti into L12 matrix with B2 and D8a second phases. • Al 3 Ti-based MEAs can be readily tailored for low density, high strength, and reasonable ductility. • Al 3 Ti-based MEAs showed superior wear resistance to those of Al-30 wt% SiCp composite and Ti6Al4V. • Representative Al 60 Ti 20 Cr 5 Mn 5 Fe 5 Cu 5 is promising for mechanical and tribological applications at medium temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWearSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207