MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407777673 · doi:10.1080/14756366.2025.2466841

Development of ketobenzothiazole-based peptidomimetic TMPRSS13 inhibitors with low nanomolar potency

2025· article· en· W4407777673 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Joushomme, Antoine Désilets, William Champagne, Malihe Hassanzadeh, Gabriel Lemieux, Alice Gravel-Trudeau, Matthieu Lepage, Sabrina Lafrenière, Ulrike Froehlich, Karin List, Pierre‐Luc Boudreault, Richard Leduc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsPeptidomimeticPotencyPharmacologyChemistryStereochemistryMedicineBiochemistryIn vitroPeptide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TMPRSS13, a member of the Type II Transmembrane Serine Proteases (TTSP) family, is involved in cancer progression and in respiratory virus cell entry. To date, no inhibitors have been specifically developed for this protease. In this study, a chemical library of 65 ketobenzothiazole-based peptidomimetic molecules was screened against a proteolytically active form of recombinant TMPRSS13 to identify novel inhibitors. Following an initial round of screening, subsequent synthesis of additional derivatives supported by molecular modelling revealed important molecular determinants involved in TMPRSS13 inhibition. One inhibitor, N-0430, achieved low nanomolar affinity towards TMPRSS13 activity in a cellular context. Using a SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus cell entry model, we further demonstrated the ability of N-0430 to block TMPRSS13-dependent entry of the pseudovirus. The identified peptidomimetic inhibitors and the molecular insights into their potency gained from this study will aid in the development of specific TMPRSS13 inhibitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal ChemistrySame topicProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesFrench-language works237,207