MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407783213 · doi:10.1109/ispa63168.2024.00110

Dependency-aware Task Offloading and Resource Pricing in Vehicular Edge Computing: A Stackelberg Game Approach

2024· article· en· W4407783213 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Zhao, Shuai Huang, Huan Zhou, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStackelberg competitionComputer scienceDependency (UML)Task (project management)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionGame theoryResource management (computing)Edge computingResource (disambiguation)Distributed computingComputer networkArtificial intelligenceMicroeconomicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicular Edge Computing (VEC) allows vehicles to offload their delay-sensitive tasks to nearby Road Side Units (RSUs) for processing, which improves network quality of service (QoS). However, the self-interested SDN controller is unwilling to ask RSUs to provide free computing resources for vehicles. At the same time, complicated dependencies between vehicular subtasks may cause non-ideal task delay and energy consumption. In order to solve these problems, this paper proposes a Stackelberg game-based Dependency-aware task Offloading and resource Pricing framework (SDOP). Specifically, we first model a vehicular edge network that partially offloads dependency-aware tasks. Then, we depict the interaction between the SDN controller and vehicles as a Stackelberg game, with the goal of maximizing the utility of both parties. Next, we present a Gradient Ascent Plus Genetic algorithm (GAPG) to solve the problem. Finally, numerous simulations are performed, and the results show that compared with other baseline schemes, the proposed GAPG can significantly improve the utility of both the SDN controller and vehicles under various scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207