MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Semi-Empirical Analysis of Polyamide 11 Hybrid Composites: Unveilingthe Journey from Simple Models to Complex Theories

2025· article· en· W4407784765 on OpenAlexaff
Shaghayegh Armioun, Jimi Tjong, Mohini Sain

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Applied Polymer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialMicrostructureFiberAnisotropyShear (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Predicting the properties of hybrid composites is challenging due to their mechanical and thermal heterogeneity, anisotropy, and complex microstructures. This has led to the development of various theoretical models, each tailored to assess specific microstructures and optimize material properties for targeted applications. Methods: The present paper presents a semi-empirical analysis of hybrid Polyamide 11 (PA11) composites reinforced with wood and carbon fibers. To predict the tensile modulus of natural fiber composites, methods such as ROM, IROM, Halpin-Tsai, Halpin-Tsai for random fiber orientations, and shear lag model equations were employed and accordingly modified. Employing the "effective matrix" approach, the modified single fiber system equations were further employed for hybrid fiber systems. The HROM, Halpin-Tsai, Halpin-Tsai for random fiber orientations, Halpin-Tsai for hybrid composites, and shear lag model equations were applied and modified for hybrid composites. objective: The objectives of this research are to develop a mathematical model for predicting the mechanical properties of hybrid composites and to validate this model with experimental data. The model will utilize predictive frameworks such as the Rule of Mixtures (ROM), Inverse Rule of Mixtures (IROM), Shear Lag model, and adaptations of the Halpin-Tsai equations. It aims to effectively capture the inherent heterogeneity and anisotropy of the composites, enhancing predictive accuracy for various microstructural configurations. Validation of the developed model through experimental comparison is crucial, ensuring its efficacy and reliability in accurately reflecting the mechanical behavior of hybrid composites under operational conditions. Results and Discussion: The Halpin-Tsai equations for randomly distributed fibers demonstrated the highest level of agreement with the experimental findings. The best-fit values for λL (longitudinal direction) and λT (Transverse direction) for randomly distributed fibers in Halpin-Tsai models were 0.372 and 0.568. These values were in excellent agreement with the original Halpin-Tsai equations for randomly dispersed fibers, which are reported as 0.375 and 0.625, respectively. Similarly, the experimental findings strongly correlate with the Halpin-Tsai equations for hybrid composites documented in the literature. Furthermore, this study effectively derived and employed modified equations from several micromechanical models to accurately predict the tensile modulus for single and hybrid fiber-reinforced composites. Conclusion: Hybrid composites of PA11 reinforced with natural and carbon fibers represent a promising approach for sustainable, high-performance materials. This study';s experimental results closely align with several established micromechanical models, including the Halpin-Tsai model for both randomly distributed short fibers and hybrid composites. Additionally, existing models for single-fiber composites, such as ROM and shear lag theory, were effectively modified to match the study';s experimental data. These modifications accounted for fiber misalignment, inadequate fiber-matrix interaction, fiber breakage, and natural fiber degradation. The modified models'; predicted moduli were consistent with the experimental findings for both single- fiber and hybrid systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesFrench-language works237,207