MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407799689 · doi:10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-10293

Stimulation of Unconsolidated Reservoirs: Sensitivity Analysis of Petrophysics Using Experimental and Numerical Methods

2025· article· en· W4407799689 on OpenAlexaff
Kais Ben Abdallah, Essaïeb Hamdi, Mohammed Hamoud

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geomechanics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrophysicsGeologySensitivity (control systems)Geotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringStimulationPetrologyPorosityEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughout the lifespan of oil fields, stimulation techniques play a crucial role in altering the petrophysical properties of the reservoir sections, hence impacting their productivity. Several studies have highlighted the significance of incorporating geomechanical effects in reservoir simulations, yet conventional simulators still fail to adequately account for this aspect. The majority of recent methods that connect fluid flow and rock mechanics focus on updating the porosity and absolute permeability while overlooking alterations in relative permeability, leading to a limited comprehension of the reservoir performance during production or stimulation phases. This study attempted to present an extensive method ranging from experimental to mathematical and ultimately numerical work that allowed for a better understanding of the geomechanics function in the behavior of an unconsolidated sandstone reservoir. Initially, a series of consolidated drained triaxial compression tests were conducted following different stress paths. Absolute and relative permeability measurements were systematically performed at several levels of volumetric strain. The experiment results showed high sensitivity, with an increase of 80% in absolute permeability and a 30% change in oil relative permeability have been reported. A robust empirical correlation relating absolute and relative permeabilities to volumetric strains was then established prior to being implemented into the reservoir simulator through a code developed internally. The results obtained during the current study have clearly demonstrated that the precision of production forecasts has significantly improved by employing coupled models that consider changes in relative permeability in concurrence with permeability and porosity. Correlations and codes developed throughout this research work can provide the decision-makers with a strong tool to acquire a better understanding of the interaction between the mechanics and fluid movement within the reservoir. Hence, a better management plan can accordingly be recommended and ultimately adopted to improve field productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of GeomechanicsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207