MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407800901 · doi:10.2196/72803

Mental Health Screening Using the Heart Rate Variability and Frontal Electroencephalography Features: A Machine Learning-Based Approach.

2025· article· en· W4407800901 on OpenAlexaff
Je‐Yeon Yun, Miseon Shim, Seonmin Kim, Seung‐Hwan Lee, Sangshin Park

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyHeart rate variabilityArtificial intelligencePsychologyComputer scienceMachine learningHeart rateMedicineNeuroscienceBlood pressureInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability (HRV) is a physiological marker of the cardiac autonomic modulation and related emotional regulation. Electroencephalography (EEG) is reflective of brain cortical activities and related psychopathology. The HRV and EEG have been employed in machine learning- and deep learning-based algorithms either alone or with other wearable device-based features to classify patients with psychiatric disorder (PT) and healthy controls (HC). Little study examined the utility of wearable device-based physiological markers to discern PT with various psychiatric diagnosis versus HC. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the HRV and prefrontal EEG features most frequently selected in the support vector machine (SVM) having the highest classification accuracy of PT versus HC, contributing to the individual-level initial screening of PT and minimized duration of untreated psychiatric illness. METHODS: A simultaneous acquisition of 5 minute-length PPG (measured on right ear lobe) and resting-state EEG (with eye-closed; using two left/right forehead-located electrodes) of 182 participants [87 PT (including major depressive disorder (70.1%) and panic disorder (12.6%)) and 95 HC] were performed. The PPG-based HRV features were quantified for both time- and frequency-domains. The time-varying EEG signals were converted into frequency-domain signals of the power spectral density. In the feature selection of the Gaussian radial basis function kernel-based support vector machine (SVM) models, estimators were comprised of top N (1£N£22) highest scored HRV/EEG features based on the one-way ANOVA F-value. Classification performance of SVM model (PT vs. HC) having N estimators was assessed using the Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV; N = 182), to confirm those showing the highest balanced accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) as final classification model. RESULTS: The final SVM model having 13 estimators showed balanced accuracy of 0.76 and AUROC of 0.78. Power spectral density of HRV in the high frequency, very low frequency, low frequency (LF) bands, and total power, a product of the mean of the 5-minute standard deviation of all NN intervals (SDNN) and normalized LF power of HRV, power spectral density of frontal EEG in the high alpha and alpha peak frequency comprised the top 13-scored classification features in > 90% of the LOOCV. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a possible synergic effect of combining the HRV and prefrontal EEG features in machine learning-based mental health screening. Future studies to predict the treatment response and to propose the preferred treatment regimen based on the baseline physiological markers are required. CLINICALTRIAL: N/A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207