MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407802860 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.oa.24.00059

The Effects of Antibiotic-Impregnated Spacers on Bone Healing in an Animal Model of the Induced Membrane Technique

2025· article· en· W4407802860 on OpenAlex
Hening Sun, Charles Godbout, Gareth Ryan, Ismail Tawakol Ali, James P. Higgins, Graeme Hoit, Jeremy Hall, Mansur Halai, Amir Khoshbin, Emil H. Schemitsch, Aaron Nauth

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJBJS Open Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersOrthopaedic Trauma Association
KeywordsTobramycinMedicineBone healingAntibioticsRadiographyX-ray microtomographyBone graftingNuclear medicineSurgeryGentamicinRadiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Surgeons performing the induced membrane technique (IMT) often incorporate antibiotics into the spacer at the first stage of the surgical procedure to prevent or treat infection. However, the effect of antibiotic use on subsequent bone healing is not clear. This study aimed to investigate if antibiotic-impregnated spacers impact subsequent bone healing in a rat model of the IMT. Methods: Inbred male rats (Fischer 344) were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the antibiotic dose in the spacer: (1) control (no antibiotics), (2) low-dose (1.2 g tobramycin and 1.0 g vancomycin per 40 g of polymethylmethacrylate [PMMA]), and (3) high-dose (3.6 g tobramycin and 3.0 g vancomycin per 40 g of PMMA). We created a 5-mm segmental defect in the right femoral diaphysis. The bone was stabilized with a plate and screws, and the assigned spacer was inserted into the defect. Four weeks later, the spacer was removed and bone graft was placed within the defect. Radiographs made 12 weeks after grafting were scored according to union status and degree of bone healing. Micro-computed tomographic (CT) analysis and biomechanical testing were also performed at 12 weeks. Results: Full radiographic union was achieved in 10 (83%) of 12 control animals, 13 (100%) of 13 low-dose animals, and 8 (62%) of 13 high-dose animals (high-dose compared with low-dose: risk ratio, 11.0; p = 0.039). The control group demonstrated higher bone volume compared with the high-dose group (mean difference, 9.0 mm 3 ; p = 0.039), and there was a trend toward higher bone volume in the low-dose group compared with the high-dose group (mean difference, 8.1 mm 3 ; p = 0.06). The biomechanical results demonstrated that maximum stiffness was significantly higher in the low-dose group compared with the high-dose group (mean difference, 14.1 N*mm/degree; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that low doses of antibiotics in PMMA spacers used for the IMT did not impair bone healing. However, high doses of antibiotics demonstrated inferior bone healing. Clinical Relevance: The addition of high-dose antibiotics to the PMMA spacers used for the IMT may result in impaired bone healing and should be used with caution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it