MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407810872 · doi:10.48095/cccu2005023

Radical laparoscopic nephrectomy in tumour with tumorous vascular thrombus (T3B)

2005· article· en· W4407810872 on OpenAlexaff
M. Hora, J. Klečka, J. Ferda, O. Hes, T. Ürge

Bibliographic record

VenueCzech Urology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNephrectomyThrombusUrologyInternal medicineKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

vod: Ndory ledviny T3b, tedy s ndorovm trombem v renln le i doln dut le (DD), jsou standardn povaovny za kontraindikaci k laparoskopii. V prci se sname podat nov poznatky o tto problematice. Vlastn soubor: V obdob 1/2003 a 6/2005 jsme provedli 71 radiklnch laparoskopickch i retroperitoneoskopickch nefrektomi pro parenchymov tumor. U 16 (22,5 %) se jednalo o kategorii pT3b, tedy histopatologicky prokzan prorstn tumoru do vtv renlnch il. U 15 z nich vak byl tumor klinicky kategorie cT1 i cT2, teprve pi histopatologickm vyeten se prokzalo prorstn do vtv renlnch il (pT3b). Hlavn kmen renln ly byl tedy vdy voln, take technika operace nebyla odlin od kategori pT1 i pT2. Pouze u jednoho 57letho mue s tumorem prav ledviny se jednalo o trombus v renln le verifikovan ji pedoperan. Rozsah tumoru byl uren dle multidetektorovho CT vetn CT-angiografie - trombus konil 1 cm od doln dut ly. Byla provedena laparoskopie, peruen renln ly pomoc endoGIA stapleru tsn u DD. Nsledn klipy peruena arterie pstupn a po peruen ly. Ledvina i s nadledvinou odstranny en bloc. Odstranna i uzlina nalhajc na renln lu a DD. as operace byl 170 min, krevn ztrta 200 ml. Histologicky se jednalo o svtlobunn renln karcinom pT3b pN0 G3. Pacient zhojen bez komplikac.Zvr: Ve vybranch ppadech lze laparoskopicky eit i tumory s ndorovm trombem v renln le. Rozhodnut o typu vkonu je mon jen na zklad multidetektorovho CT, vetn CT-angiografie i pomoc vysoce vkonnho MRI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCzech UrologySame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207