MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407816019 · doi:10.1016/j.vaa.2025.02.006

Management of adverse effects after inadvertent intrathecal injection of morphine in a dog undergoing thoracotomy

2025· article· en· W4407816019 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hannah Fisher, Latifa Khenissi

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaThoracotomyIntrathecalMorphineAdverse effectSurgeryPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 33-kg adult Labrador Retriever dog presented for investigation of pneumothorax . A computed tomography scan confirmed the diagnosis, and right lateral thoracotomy and lung lobectomy were performed under general anaesthesia. During surgery, anaesthesia was maintained with a propofol constant-rate intravenous (IV) infusion (premedication with methadone and dexmedetomidine) and IV atracurium was given to facilitate surgery. A lumbosacral epidural injection of preservative-free morphine (0.3 mg kg -1 diluted to 6.6 mL with sterile saline) was performed. Using a spinal needle, the ‘hanging drop’ method of detecting the epidural space was attempted but the saline drop was not aspirated, and cerebrospinal fluid entered the needle hub, indicating inadvertent dural puncture. The needle was partially withdrawn and a lack of resistance to injection confirmed before injection of morphine. Following injection, myoclonus of the tail was observed throughout surgery, continuing after atracurium administration. Following surgery, the propofol infusion was reduced from 0.3 to 0.1 mg kg -1 minute -1 to encourage spontaneous ventilation after confirmation of neuromuscular function. Spontaneous ventilation, swallow and palpebral reflexes did not return. The following treatments were unsuccessful in eliciting spontaneous ventilation: allowing end-tidal CO 2 to increase [up to 60 mmHg (8 kPa)], reducing inspired oxygen fraction to 0.4, injection of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate , and stopping propofol delivery. Three doses of butorphanol (each 0.5 mg kg -1 IV) were given 30 minutes apart to antagonize the effects of morphine as it was suspected that inadvertent intrathecal injection had been performed. Butorphanol administration was associated with return of spontaneous ventilation, palpebral and swallow reflexes, and full recovery from anaesthesia. Continuous rate infusions of butorphanol and dexmedetomidine were used for 12 hours to treat any residual respiratory depression and provide sedation to manage continued myoclonus. Myoclonus resolved within 24 hours. The dog was discharged 3 days later and suffered no ongoing adverse effects .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Anaesthesia and AnalgesiaSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207