MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407819795 · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.179335

Laser-based direct energy deposition of compositionally graded titanium alloys: Microstructural evolution, hardness, and tensile properties

2025· article· en· W4407819795 on OpenAlexafffund
S.S. Dash, Zhiying Liu, Lizhong Lang, Tianyi Lyu, D.L. Chen, Yu Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Alloys and Compounds · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMaterials scienceUltimate tensile strengthTitaniumTitanium alloyMicrostructureIndentation hardnessLaserMetallurgyComposite materialDeposition (geology)OpticsAlloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser-based direct energy deposition (DED) technology allows researchers to alter feeding materials while fabricating products and offering opportunities for producing compositionally graded materials such as graded alloys for structural applications. Many graded alloys suffer from their poor tensile properties due to asperities formed at the interface of two materials, arising from microstructural mismatches and varying thermal properties. Towards the load-bearing applications of lightweight dissimilar titanium alloys, we employ the DED method to fabricate a compositionally graded material consisting of the Ti-6Al-4V (TC4) alloy and Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr-0.3Si (TC11) alloy. We investigate the effects of heterogeneous microstructure and compositions on the hardness and tensile properties of the graded TC11-TC4 alloy, as well as heat treatment effects, to unveil their microstructure evolution and deformation mechanisms. The smooth change of chemical compositions across the graded TC11-TC4 alloy interface leads to a smooth change of interfacial hardness from ∼320 HV0.3 on the TC4 side to ∼380 HV0.3 on the TC11 side. The as-deposited and heat-treated specimens show comparable yield strength (806–860 MPa), ultimate tensile strength (921–937 MPa), and ductility (7.8–8.6 %) despite different microstructures. We demonstrate a correlation between the microstructural features and micro-deformation mechanisms in each region of the graded Ti-alloy, showing that the graded interfacial region resists plastic strain localization. The micro- and macro-mechanical properties of the graded alloy are associated with the distribution, size, morphology, and orientation of the α and β phases. • Graded TC11-TC4 titanium alloy manufactured using direct energy deposition method. • As-deposited and heat-treated alloys showed superior performance at the interface. • Coherent metallurgical bonding led to a strong graded interface. • Graded chemical composition controlled the phase size and distribution. • Local deformation behavior of phases affected the global mechanical properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Alloys and CompoundsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207