MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407823342 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djaf038

Colon, colorectal, and all cancer incidence increase in the young due to appendix reclassification

2025· article· en· W4407823342 on OpenAlexaff
Archie Bleyer, Lynn A. G. Ries, Danielle B. Cameron, Sara A. Mansfield, Stuart E. Siegel, Ronald D. Barr

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)AppendixColorectal cancerCancerEpidemiologyInternal medicineYoung adultGastroenterologyOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Increases in colon and colorectal cancer incidence among adolescents and young adults have been reported progressively. Most of the increase may be because of an artifact caused by reclassifying appendiceal carcinoids and neuroendocrine tumor (NET) as malignant. METHODS: Age-adjusted incidence and survival data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER22 database. RESULTS: In adolescents and young adults during 2000-2020, appendix cancer had an average annual percent change in incidence increase that in males was 3.7 times greater than the next most increasing cancer (average annual percent change = 12.8, 95% confidence interval CI] = 10.9% to 14.6% vs average annual percent change = 3.4 [kidney], 95% CI = 2.7% to 3.5%) and correspondingly in females 2.9-fold greater (average annual percent change = 14.6,95% CI = 11.9% to 17.3% vs average annual percent change = 4.2 [pancreas], 95% CI = 3.6% to 4.8%). From 2000-2009 to 2015-2020, appendix cancer incidence increased 17-, 6.5-, and 2.5-fold in children aged 0-14 years, adolescents and young adults aged 15-39 years, and adults aged 40-49 years, respectively. NET accounted for 95%, 90%, and 80% of appendix cancer increase in the 3 age groups, respectively. In 3446 adolescents and young adults diagnosed during 2010-2020 with malignant appendix NET, the 6-year cancer-specific survival was 99.4% (95% CI = 99.0% to 99.6%). From 2000-2009 to 2015-2020, colon carcinoma incidence in adolescents and young adults increased 61% with the appendix included and only 11% with the appendix excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Reclassification of appendix NET/carcinoids as malignant has artifactually increased the incidence of colon, colorectum, and all cancer in children and adolescents and young adults. Appendix NET/carcinoids are rarely fatal in those aged younger than 40 years and should not be considered as cancer and included in colorectal cancer analyses. To the extent that the appendix artifact occurs in adults aged 40-49 years, recommendations for starting colorectal cancer screening earlier may be affected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteSame topicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesFrench-language works237,207