MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407823539 · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70011

The afterlife effects of leaf and root litter traits on soil N cycling

2025· article· en· W4407823539 on OpenAlexaff
Janna Wambsganss, Raoul Huys, Vincent Poirier, Alison D. Munson, Grégoire T. Freschet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheLaboratoire d'Excellence TULIPCentre Méditerranéen de l’Environnement et de la Biodiversité
KeywordsCyclingAfterlifeLitterPlant litterEnvironmental scienceAgronomyBiologyEcologyForestryGeographyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Litter nitrogen (N) release during decomposition crucially influences ecosystem N cycling and the amount of N available to plants and other soil organisms. However, the role of initial litter traits in affecting patterns of temporal N release from litters and determining the fate of N in the soil is still poorly understood. Here, we measured litter N release during the 12‐month decomposition of 15 N‐labelled leaf and root litters of 12 common Mediterranean herbaceous species. We further traced the fate of N during decomposition of the litters into the soil and measured the inorganic N content in the soil solution as well as total N in the particulate (POM) and mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) fractions at the end of the incubation. While most litters exhibited a very rapid initial N release, they were also quite variable in their N dynamics. As such they differed in the quantity and temporal patterns of N release, the accumulation of inorganic N in the soil solution, as well as in the incorporation of N in stable soil organic matter (SOM) fractions during decomposition. This variability was driven by differences in initial litter chemistry, particularly N, but also P and Mn, and litter C leachate concentrations. These and other traits (including water‐soluble compounds and lignin concentrations) explained up to 81% of the variance in N release rate, 48% for N accumulation in the soil solution, 57% for N entering the soil POM and 55% for MAOM fraction. Synthesis . We identified litter traits and litter types (root versus leaf) with afterlife effects on N cycling in soils and important implications for ecosystem functioning. Highly decomposable litters (typically high N; including most leaf litters) generally support a fast N release through mineralization, thereby the immediate supply of N to plants, but also potentially higher losses from the system, and long‐term storage as MAOM‐N, likely within microbial resynthesis products. In contrast, poorly decomposable litters (typically low N; including most root litters) promote longer and weaker N release and foster N retention via lower N losses and increased POM‐N formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EcologySame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207