Longitudinal association between creative arts participation with cognitive function in late life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Examine relationships between arts participation in high school and later life, cognition, and cognitive change among older adults in the United States. DESIGN: Longitudinal retrospective SETTING: Health and Retirement Survey (HRS) including the Life History Mail Surveys (LHMS) and Consumption and Activities Mail Survey (CAMS). PARTICIPANTS: A sample of HRS respondents with cognition data from Wave 3 (1996) through Wave 14 (2018). We merged LHMS and CAMS responses (2017 and 2019) about high school arts participation, eliminating respondents < 50 years of age, without cognitive data in the last three waves, or with normal cognition following previously reported dementia. MEASUREMENTS: Respondents were categorized into 4 groups for musical and for visual arts): (1) lifelong learners; (2) high school learners; (3) current learners; and (4) no interest. Cognitive function was measured as a continuous summary score on a 27-point cognitive battery of items in the Langa-Weir Classification total Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, TICS. RESULTS: Musical arts participation at time of the survey was associated with a slower rate of cognitive decline in the entire sample (3505 participants in musical and 3507 in visual arts) and the War Babies cohort. Those who participated in musical arts at the time of the survey and while in high school experienced a slower rate of cognitive decline in the AHEAD-CODA cohort only. No relationships were found between cognition and times of visual arts participation. CONCLUSIONS: Some types of arts participation at different periods of life may benefit cognition later in life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".