Reductive Leaching Investigation of Li-NMC Cathode Material Related to Spent Battery Recycling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrification of transportation and proliferation of portable electronics are rapidly increasing, leading to a significant demand for Li-ionLithium-ion battery batteriesBattery (LIBs)LIB batteries, specifically NMCNMC-type batteriesBattery. This surge in demand for Li, Ni, Mn, and Co elements is unsustainable if it relied solely on mining. Therefore, the need to prioritize lithiumLithium-ionLithium-ion battery battery recyclingBattery recycling in the coming decades is not just important, but urgent. While the hydrometallurgyHydrometallurgy process is considered greener for metal recoveryMetal recovery compared to pyrometallurgy, it requires further enhancements to address sustainabilitySustainability and environmental issues. These include reducing excessive acid usage and concomitant waste minimization (acidic wastewater and Na2SO4 production). To address these issues, the present work focused on improving the leachingLeaching efficiency of spent NMCNMC cathode material using a minimum amount of acid. We carried out the reductive leachingReductive leaching of spent Li-NMCNMC in H2SO4 media in a redox-controlled single feed semi-batch reactor through the regulated addition of H2O2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".