Uplift History of the Eastern Pamir Inferred from Inversion of Thermochronometric Data and River Profile
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Pamir salient accommodates a great amount of Cenozoic India-Eurasia convergence in the forms of thrusting, strike-slip faulting, extension, and gneiss dome formation. It thus becomes a key location for exploring the orogenic tectonic evolution. Here, we focus on the Eastern Pamir where extensional deformation dominates during the late Cenozoic. We conducted low-temperature thermochronological dating on bedrock samples collected from the footwall of the Kongur Shan normal fault together with inversion of the longitudinal river profile of the Gez River. Our new zircon and apatite (U-Th)/He (ZHe and AHe) data reveal young ages in proximity to the normal fault and older ages adjacent to the western Tarim Basin. By inverting the Gez River profile together with published and new thermochronological ages, we obtained a sustained uplift rate of ~3 mm/yr in the Kongur Shan dome since ~8 Ma, contrasting with no significant uplift to the east of the dome before the Pliocene. This uplift pattern can be interpreted as a result of the upward extrusion of crust materials along a flat–ramp–flat thrust fault at depth under the context of convergence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it