MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407837229 · doi:10.1093/jme/tjaf017

First report of the deer ked, <i>Lipoptena cervi</i>, and associated pathogens in southern Québec, Canada

2025· article· en· W4407837229 on OpenAlexaffabout
Catherine Bouchard, Ariane Dumas, Carol-Ann Desrochers-Plourde, Raphaëlle Audet-Legault, Marine Hubert, Cécile Aenishaenslin, Jean-Philippe Rocheleau, Patrick A. Leighton, Anaïs Gasse, Mahmood Iranpour, Brooks Waitt, Heather Coatsworth

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Entomology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBartonella species infections research
Canadian institutionsBishop's UniversityMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des ForêtsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint HyacinthePublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyOdocoileusVeterinary medicineRange (aeronautics)ZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deer keds (Lipoptena cervi), an introduced European species, are expanding their geographic range in North America. We document their first recorded presence in Québec, Canada, map their distribution, and highlight the detection of pathogens of potential public health relevance. In the Estrie region of southern Québec, 47 deer keds (L. cervi) were collected from 14 (5.5%) of 254 harvested white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Borrelia spp. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum were detected in the body of 1/44 and 8/44 L. cervi specimens, respectively. A statistically significant spatial cluster of white-tailed deer infested by L. cervi was found in southern Estrie using the Bernoulli-based spatial scan statistic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical EntomologySame topicBartonella species infections researchFrench-language works237,207