MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advanced Electrospun Membrane for Comprehensive Strain Detection

2024· article· en· W4407847980 on OpenAlexaff
Parian Mohamadi, Shahood uz Zaman, Elham Mohsenzadeh, Cédric Cochrane, Vladan Končar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrain (injury)Materials scienceMembraneComputer scienceChemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In contemporary times, the heightened concern surrounding air pollution, with its substantial annual death toll, has spurred industries to tackle the issue by creating large-scale air filtration systems for public spaces. Detecting air filter clogging is crucial for maintenance, reducing system energy consumption by timely cleaning or replacement. The intriguing field of e-textiles, widely applied in medical, safety, military, and clogging detection scenarios, integrates components seamlessly into soft textile materials based on specific usage requirements. Nanofibers, with their advantageous properties like porosity, lightweight, and high surface area, stand out as a prominent textile structure. To achieve conductive nanofibers, the research focuses on employing in situ conductivity using conductive particles and surface conductivity through immersion and printing methods. Utilizing an electrospinning system, thermoplastic polyurethane nanofibers are produced, with carbon ink printed in various patterns to make them suitable for textile sensor applications. The study concludes by testing membranes with different printed patterns in a ventilation tunnel under varying velocities, assessing the impact of patterns on electrical properties and pressure drop. Ultimately, these conductive membranes show promise as effective strain sensors for detecting air filter clogging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207