MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

How is grocery shopping completed in households with children? Gender gaps and typologies of grocery shopping in four Canadian metropolises

2025· article· en· W4407853363 on OpenAlex
Chunjiang Li, Michael J. Widener

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport Geography · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsGrocery shoppingGrocery storeBusinessAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grocery shopping is important household labor that directly impacts diet quality and related downstream health outcomes. Like other household tasks, it is usually divided unequally in opposite-gender households, with women doing more grocery shopping than men. However, common indicators used to identify gender gaps, like activity frequency and duration, are unable to sufficiently depict the full picture of the constraints faced by women during grocery shopping activities. This is especially evident for women in households with children, who often share more care-related labor. To address this gap, this paper examined the gender differences in grocery shopping activities across multiple dimensions, including frequency, duration, grocery store types, travel modes, the presence of companions, timing of shopping, and trip chaining. Drawing upon the Time Use & Food Habits survey conducted in four Canadian metropolitan areas in 2021, the results show that women and men in households with children exhibited different characteristics of grocery shopping across multiple dimensions. Women compared to men not only spent more time shopping, but also were less likely to drive to stores and more likely to shop during working hours and with companions. Gender differences were further compared among different classifications of grocery shopping patterns identified through latent class analysis. Various gender gaps were found across different classifications, with women shopping with others possibly having some of the most complex constraints. Multinominal logistic regression shows that shopping with others was associated with identifying as female, being relatively lower socioeconomic status, having greater housework responsibilities, and living in areas with higher grocery store density. Overall, this study provides evidence of nuanced gender gaps of grocery shopping in multiple dimensions, within different groups of people, and across a range of cities of various sizes. • Mobility dimensions are analyzed to examine gender gaps in grocery shopping. • Women differ from men regarding travel modes, shopping timing, and trip companions. • Various gender gaps are found across different grocery shopping types identified by LCA. • Women in the type “shopping with others” experience multiple constraints. • Urban environment is related to shopping types that exhibit more gender differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it