Seizures associated with dural arteriovenous fistulas: A systematic review of cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) are an unusual cause of seizures. In this systematic review, we aim to describe the clinical features, paraclinical findings, management, and prognosis of cases of DAVF-related seizures, raising awareness for a potentially treatable cause of epilepsy. METHODS: This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024529316). We searched OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for case reports/series of patients presenting with seizures associated with DAVFs. Original studies describing at least two out of four outcome categories (clinical features, paraclinical findings, treatment, and prognosis) were included. The methodological quality of each study was evaluated using a standardized tool. We performed descriptive analyses to summarize the clinical characteristics of all cases. We repeated these analyses while excluding cases where seizures may have had a likelier cause than DAVFs. RESULTS: In total, 120 patients were included from 94 articles. Median age was 57 years, and most patients were male (70 %). The most common manifestations accompanying seizures were headaches (22 %). Status epilepticus occurred in 38 % of cases. DAVFs were most commonly in the left hemisphere. The main venous sinus involved was the transverse sinus. Cortical venous reflux was present in almost all cases (93 %); most DAVFs were considered aggressive according to Cognard and Borden classifications. Seizure freedom was most common following angiographic interventions. CONCLUSION: DAVFs, even when uncomplicated, can be a potential cause of treatable seizures. More aggressive DAVFs with cortical venous reflux seem to be the main culprit. Angiographic interventions can help achieve seizure freedom.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".