MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407858242 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-87706-0

Melanin from the fungus Gliocephalotrichum simplex protects seeds from the effects of exposure to gamma radiation

2025· article· en· W4407858242 on OpenAlexaff
Swaraj Priyaranjan Kunal, Sushrut Bhanushali, Seshagiri Raghukumar, Ekaterina Dadachova

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersDepartment of Atomic Energy, Government of India
KeywordsFungusMelaninBiologyIonizing radiationMicrobiologyMedicineBotanyIrradiationBiochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protection of seeds from ionizing radiation is an important future need in space travel. We examined the usefulness of eumelanin from the fungus Gliocephalotrichum MTCC 5489 for this purpose. Seeds of Oryza sativa, Brassica nigra, Vigna radiata and V. aconitifolia were enclosed in Petri dishes coated with paint containing various concentrations of nanomelanin and exposed to doses of 0.1 to 2.0 kGy Cs-137 or 0.1 to 0.5 kGy Co-60 radiation. While Cs-137 radiation severely affected the rate of germination (germination index, GI) and germination percentage of Oryza sativa, whereas other seeds were less affected, Co-60 markedly diminished the GI of all the seeds. Increasing concentrations of melanin coating afforded significant protection to the GI of O. sativa seeds exposed to Cs-137 and to all seeds exposed to Co-60 radiation. The germination percentage of seeds was dose- and radiation dependent, with no effect observed for all doses of Cs-137 or 0.1 kGy Co-60 radiation, whereas 0.5 kGy Co-60 radiation killed 50 to 60% of the unprotected seeds. Melanin paint offered nearly 100% survival. This study demonstrated that melanin-containing materials can provide effective shielding from gamma radiation for diverse types of seeds that are important for human consumption, which has implications for space agriculture and agriculture in extreme environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207