MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407862108 · doi:10.2196/52928

Association Among BMI, Self-Esteem, and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in Young Adults to Understand the Influence of Socioenvironmental Factors: Longitudinal Study

2025· article· en· W4407862108 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qiu Zhang, Ruixue Ying, Xuemeng Liu, Keyan Hu, Qing Feng, Fangting Lu, Yahu Miao, Nevin Ma, Fangbiao Tao, Tian Jiang, Qiu Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMediationClinical psychologyOverweightSelf-esteemModerationMental healthAnxietyStructural equation modelingBody mass indexMedicinePsychiatrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a major public health problem leading to psychological problems in adolescents and young adults, similar to disorders such as depression and anxiety. Objective: The aims of this study were to investigate (1) the interaction between BMI and socioenvironmental factors (including chronotype and mental health) that contribute to NSSI, and (2) whether self-esteem plays a mediating role in this association. Methods: From May to June 2022, the multistage cluster sampling method was used to sample college students in four grades, including freshmen and seniors. The baseline participants were followed up 6 months later, excluding those who did not qualify, and the participants included 1772 college students. Socioenvironmental factors (chronotype/mental health), self-esteem, and NSSI were measured using a questionnaire. Multivariate linear regression models and chi-square analysis were used to evaluate the linear relationship between BMI, socioenvironmental factors, and self-esteem and the NSSI status. We use a process approach (mediation-moderation analysis) to explore the complex relationships between these variables. Results: The mean age of the participants was 20.53 (SD 1.65) years at baseline. A significant association was revealed, suggesting that a high BMI (β=.056, 95% CI 0.008-0.086, P=.018) was associated with a higher NSSI. There was also an interaction among BMI, socioenvironmental factors, and NSSI. Socioenvironmental factors played both moderating and mediating roles in the relationship between BMI and NSSI, whereas self-esteem only played a mediating role. Conclusions: Paying attention to factors such as overweight and obesity is important for early BMI control to identify other potential risk factors for NSSI and to evaluate how self-esteem can be improved considering multiple perspectives to improve the effect of BMI on NSSI in adolescents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance→Same topicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies→French-language works237,207→